🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has maintained a prohibition on deploying national guard in Portland, Oregon, following a recent legal decision.

Appeals Court Concurs to Reconsider Case

The federal appeals court decided on Tuesday that it would rehear the legal dispute concerning the executive power with an expanded group of eleven justices. The judicial body also vacated a previous ruling from a smaller judicial group that had supported the administration.

Ongoing Dispute Over Military Presence

This order represents the most recent development in a long-running legal battle over whether the administration has the authority and valid reason to deploy national guard forces in the city. Approximately two hundred troops have been in limbo since late September when the deployment effort was started in due to months of protests.

Differing Viewpoints

The administration has claimed that government employees at the immigration center in the southern part of the city were under attack, while local authorities assert that municipal police have control of the situation.

In defiance of characterizations of the city as “war ravaged”, locals have been posting footage of scenic paths and a thriving food scene, and organizing activities such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the increased military presence.

Court Proceedings

The Tuesday ruling came after a federal judge in Portland enacted two temporary restraining orders this month – one preventing the federalization of the state troops, and another prohibiting the use of any military personnel in the state, after efforts to circumvent the initial injunction by calling up out-of-state forces.

On Monday, the appeals court had temporarily suspended the initial decision – permitting control of state troops – but the subsequent injunction remained in place, preventing the physical sending of the forces.

Full Panel Consideration

The Tuesday decision means the matter will be heard by the full court – with both rulings under review together – by a group of eleven justices.

“This decision demonstrates that facts are important and that the judicial system are working to hold this administration accountable. The founding document limits the president’s power, and local populations cannot be treated as a testing site for expansive government power,” stated the state attorney general in a official comment.

“The judicial body is sending a clear message: the executive leader cannot dispatch the military into US cities unnecessarily. We will continue protecting Oregon’s laws, values, and sovereignty as this case moves forward and our fight continues in the judicial system.”